![]()
|
Ottawa plans tougher detention rules, and braces for opposition
Toronto Star Ottawa Bureau OTTAWA `IT'S DIFFICULT to make policy with a gun to your head.'' That blunt statement by a senior immigration official after this week's federal cabinet meeting sums up the dilemma facing Immigration Minister Elinor Caplan. The gun is the unprecedented public outcry over this summer's arrival of boatloads of Chinese migrants, a groundswell that has spawned newspaper headlines shrieking such sentiments as Send them home, and fuelled pressure for a crackdown on refugee claimants. Caplan is caught between the demand for change and a desire to uphold this country's humanitarian traditions. The minister has cautioned against ``rushing to some kind of ill-considered quick fix,'' but has also promised reforms that go beyond proposals the government has already made public. ``In the face of recent events, I believe we can do more,'' Caplan said in a speech last month to the Canadian Club in Vancouver. Since then, the minister has declined interview requests, telling reporters she's waiting for the Oct. 12 Speech From The Throne before making any more announcements on refugee policy. Caplan and her top officials have made clear that they are not consideringa total overhaul of Canada's refugee system - as the Reform party has advocated. Everyone who arrives in Canada and makes a refugee claim will still get a full hearing and have the chance to appeal in court if the claim is rejected. But in the wake of the arrival of 600 migrants in British Columbia, the immigration department is considering legislative changes that would increase the use of detention, in tandem with efforts to speed up refugee hearings and deportation proceedings. The key element is a proposal to detain refugee claimants who arrive in trafficking operations for the duration of the refugee determination process - for months at a time - on the grounds that they wouldn't show up for their hearings otherwise. That would give the minister the power to override current Immigration Act stipulations that refugee claimants cannot be locked up without a detention review by an adjudicator within 48 hours of being held, followed by another review seven days later and every 30 days after that. Instead, refugee claimants would get a single detention review hearing at which the immigration department would argue they should be detained throughout the determination process - up to six months. Detention would act as a deterrent to other boat people thinking of embarking for Canada and would prevent refugee claimants from slipping out of the country or evading deportation, officials say. But detention is also a prickly issue in Canada that rubs up against civil liberties and the proposals are sure to enrage refugee advocates who can't abide the notion of any genuine refugees ending up behind bars. ``I fear a knee-jerk response to the most basest form of public opinion,'' says lawyer Sharryn Aiken, a professor at Osgoode Hall Law School and former president of the Canadian Council for Refugees. ``Detention is a tough issue. No one likes it, and it's not something that you do lightly in a liberal society if you believe in individual liberties,'' says one Caplan political aide. ``But on the other hand, if you're going to stop the smuggling, that's the black market economics of it. You can't let these guys get away with this.''
A REFUGEE?
AN IMMIGRANT? Greg Fyffe, the immigration department's assistant deputy minister for policy, confirmed in an interview that legislation to beef up detention powers is an option. ``If you're trying to contain the movement, you have to be able to detain people for the whole process, otherwise you've just created a bottleneck that will be opened up,'' says Fyffe. ``If you release people who come in by boat, a substantial portion of them will disappear, so you have to be able to use that to argue that certain categories of people are liable to take off.'' Fyffe, aware of the controversy the proposal will generate, stresses that he is not suggesting that individual detention hearings be scrapped. ``I'm not suggesting that we would detain people in batches without giving them an individual hearing,'' Fyffe says. But he says the proposal would entail changing the law on detention review so that there would be one detention hearing at the outset, rather than periodic reviews. ``That means not going back (for another detention review) when we've made an argument that they had to be detained for three, four, five or six months,'' Fyffe says. Fyffe says detention would act as a deterrent by sending a clear message that migrants arriving in Canada would only get access to North America if they are determined to be refugees. Otherwise they would be deported. ``And that's really the only hope we have because there is really no practical way of intercepting the movement on the high seas,'' he says. Making increased use of detention would cost money, because existing facilities - military bases, immigration detention centres and jails - are not adequate. The average cost of detention is about $200 per person, per day, including accommodation, food and the detention facility itself. Caplan has also indicated she wants to push ahead with the package of refugee system reforms put forward by the immigration department in a policy paper published earlier this year. That will mean devoting more resources to interdicting improperly documented migrants bound for Canada at foreign airports, conducting better screening at first interviews with refugee claimants on arrival and improving removal procedures. The policy paper also advocated streamlining the system by collapsing three levels of review into one. Currently, a refugee claimant can get a hearing at the Immigration and Refugee Board and, if rejected, get another review prior to deportation to make sure they won't face danger if deported. And anyone facing deportation from Canada can apply for a further review on humanitarian and compassionate grounds. Instead, the Immigration and Refugee Board would make a single decision covering off all three layers. That single decision would still be open to judicial review at the Federal Court, but there is also some room to streamline due process, by shortening deadlines for various legal procedures, Fyffe says. Caplan's advisers insist they won't be stampeded into change and will consult widely before unveiling a package of measures. ``The worst thing would be to do something quickly and then have it fail. Everyone realizes that if we have to spend a whack of money on this, let's get it right,'' the political aide says.
![]()
|
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
Contents copyright © 1996-1999, The Toronto Star. User interface, selection and arrangement copyright © 1996-1999, Torstar Electronic Publishing Ltd. Contact Us |