www.globeandmail.com News Books Careers Mutual Funds Stocks ROB Magazine Technology
Home  |  Business  |  National  |  International  |  Sports  |  Features  |  Forums  |  Subscribe

The Globe and Mail
Friday, Oct. 22
leaf

7 Day Search

Tips - Other Options

Contents
bulletReport on Business
bulletNational
bulletInternational
bulletSports
bulletFeatures
bulletArts & Leisure
bulletCommentary
bulletFocus & Books
bulletAutomotive new
bulletClassifieds
bulletBirths & Deaths
bulletFood & Dining new
bulletTravel
bulletHealth
bulletScience
bulletTechnology
News Index
bulletArts & Leisure
 Art
 Books
 Broadcast Week
 Fashion & Design
 Film
 Music
 Television
 Theatre
 TV Listings

bulletAutomotive new
bulletBirths & Deaths
bulletClassifieds
 Automotive
 Business Marketplace
 Careers
 National personals
 Online personals
 Place an Ad
 Real estate rentals
 Real estate sales
 Services & Merchandise

bulletCommentary
 Editorials
 Editorial Cartoon
 Letters to the Editor
 Send letter to the Editor

bulletFeatures
 Amazing Facts
 Century of the Millennium
 Essay
 Family Matters series new
 Lives Lived
 Millennium 100
 Social Studies
 Wax and Wane

bulletFocus & Books
 Book news
 Book reviews
 Focus Columns

bulletFood & Dining new
bulletHealth
bulletInternational
 Columns
bulletNational
 Columns
 Discussion Forums
 Report

bulletReport on Business
   - Staff Biographies
 Annual Reports
 Managing
 Money & Markets
 ROB Top 1000
 Small Business
 Smart Numbers
 Special Reports
 1999 Federal Budget

bulletScience
bulletSports
   - Staff Biographies
 Basketball
 Baseball
 Football
 Golf
 Hockey
 Other Sports

bulletTechnology
bulletTravel
Magazines
bulletROBmagazine.com
Special Interest
bulletCommunication Solutions new
bulletIT Management
bulletMillennium Series
 
Search Results

Court cases seen as test of China's grip on Hong Kong
Landmark hearings may help to answer the question of just how
much control Beijing intends to exert in the former British colony

MIRO CERNETIG
The Globe and Mail; With a report from Associated Press
Tuesday, October 19, 1999

Hong Kong -- Two landmark cases before Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal will decide tomorrow how deep Beijing's control over the former British colony has become.

In one case, the judges will decide whether citizens can burn the Chinese flag, an act that incenses Beijing, but is seen by many in Hong Kong as a measure of political freedom.

In the other, they will rule whether China's government can overturn court decisions that the Communist regime does not agree with.

"People are alarmed [that] Hong Kong is losing some of the freedoms it used to enjoy under British colonial rule," said Emily Lau, a pro-democracy member of Hong Kong's legislative council.

"It wasn't a paradise under the British, but things that were tolerated in the past are not being tolerated now. There have been alarming signals."

She said one of them came recently in Hong Kong's Mongkok district, where a flag of Taiwan was displayed on private property until it was ripped down by a plainclothes police officer.

Under British control, flying the Taiwan flag was often overlooked, even though it was a controversial act. Asked why the flag was taken down, a police spokesman spoke of mainland policy, telling reporters that it was "to protect the principle of one China." (China claims the island is a breakaway province.)

From the day it took back Hong Kong a little more than two years ago, China's Communist Party leadership has sloughed off accusations that it would be unable to resist meddling in Hong Kong's internal affairs.

But Beijing's heavy hand in what used to be known as Asia's freest city is becoming impossible to deny. China's top man in Hong Kong, chief executive Tung Chee-hwa, has even gone so far as to tell pro-democracy legislators to drop the emotional baggage of the June 4 Tiananmen Square massacre of pro-democracy students in 1989.

"I hope the Democratic Party and the democratic camp will improve their understanding of the country of China," Mr. Tung said. "I have mentioned my hope that you can prove your worth in every respect, but I've looked again and again and seen nothing."

"Mr. Tung Chee-hwa has shown himself absolutely as Beijing's mouthpiece in Hong Kong," said Martin Lee, the leader of Hong Kong's Democratic Party, who has been denied visas to enter China.

"Nobody knows if Mr. Tung is told what to say by Beijing, . . . but the influence of China on him is obvious to see. There is growing concern that Hong Kong will just become another Chinese city."

A watershed in Hong Kong's future will be the Final Appeal Court's decisions tomorrow.

"When these cases are heard before the court, issues of state power versus the jurisdiction of the court will be seriously challenged," said Law Yuk-kai, director of the Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor.

"It's quite crucial for the rule of law in Hong Kong, and crucial for freedom of expression."

The five judges will first take up the flag-burning case. Two participants at pro-democracy rallies, Ng Kung-siu and Lee King-yung, are fighting a conviction under the flag-burning law that took effect after the handover and carries penalties of up to three years in prison.

The Court of Appeal threw out their convictions, saying the law violated their free-speech rights.

Hong Kong leaders want Beijing to weigh in, and are asking the Court of Final Appeal to seek an opinion from China before it rules, according to a source familiar with the case. The source agreed to speak only if granted anonymity.

Earlier this year, in another controversial immigration case, the Court of Final Appeal ruled that children of Hong Kong residents living in China had the right to live in Hong Kong. Many of the children are the offspring of Hong Kong men whose mistresses live in China.

Beijing told the court that it had gotten the law wrong.

Critics say that if the court bows to Beijing's interpretation of the law in a new immigration case to begin Oct. 25, that will effectively make Beijing the "court of semi-final appeal."

Last year, Mr. Tung ushered through a controversial policy requiring schools to teach Mandarin as the main language. In the past, schools were allowed to decide such matters on a more local level, meaning English was often preferred after the local Cantonese language.

China's influence, like Mr. Tung's in Hong Kong, is far from absolute, of course. The proof is that legislators even dare to debate Mr. Tung at all. Unlike China, where newspapers do not discuss government discord, Hong Kong's newspapers have splashed the recent fracas on their front pages.

But there is no denying that in the past few weeks, Mr. Tung has further cemented his reputation as the Communists' man in Hong Kong. Many say he is helping China to slowly absorb Hong Kong, eroding the rule of law and the independence that the Communist regime promised to leave untouched for the next half-century.

"Maybe Beijing should have been honest from the start and said absorption into China is inevitable," Ms. Lau said. "But that isn't what they said."

 
Noteworthy
Barbara Coloroso: Host of this week's Family Matters discussion
In her internationally acclaimed, bestselling classic Kids Are Worth It!, Barbara Coloroso offers solid practical advice for parents of children, from toddlers to teenagers.

Bon Appétit!
Restaurants across Canada, reviews, recipes, and wine.

Discussion Forums
bulletPierre Elliott Trudeau: What has been his legacy?
We invite you to read our special report and tell us how he has made a difference.

bulletLove at the Office
What are the ins and outs of office romance? Join this discussion

bulletCareers
"You need experience to get hired? People get rejected all the time. Why?" Share your personal story

bulletMutual Funds
Insider trading is it because of the Internet? Let us know in the globefund.com discussion forums

bulletTechnology
Is Canada Post losing it? A lively discussion on what effect E-mail is having on Canada Post. Canada Post's demise

Help & Contact Us
Back to the top of this page
Copyright © 1999 Globe Information Services