Refugee system 'scandalous,' judge says
www.globeandmail.com News Books Careers Mutual Funds Stocks ROB Magazine Technology
Home  |  Business  |  National  |  International  |  Sports  |  Features  |  Arts  |  Forums  |  Subscribe

The Globe and Mail
Friday, Nov. 05
leaf stats

7 Day Search

Tips - Other Options
space
The Millennium in Antarctica Contest space
Contents
bulletReport on Business
bulletNational
bulletInternational
bulletSports
bulletFeatures
bulletGlobe Review
bulletComment
bulletFocus & Books
bulletAutomotive new
bulletClassifieds
bulletBirths & Deaths
bulletFood & Dining new
bulletTravel
bulletHealth
bulletScience
bulletTechnology

NorstarMall.ca

News Index
bulletAutomotive new
bulletBirths & Deaths
bulletClassifieds
 Automotive
 Business MarketPlace
 Careers
 National Personals
 Real Estate Rentals
 Real Estate Sales
 Services and Merchandise

bulletComment
 Editorials
 Editorial Cartoon
 Letters to the Editor
 Send letter to the Editor

bulletFeatures
 Amazing Facts
 Century of the Millennium
 Essay
 Family Matters series new
 Lives Lived
 Millennium 100
 Social Studies
bullet Focus & Books
 Book news
 Book reviews
 Focus Columns

bulletFood & Dining new
bulletGlobe Review
 Art
 Books
 Broadcast Week
 Fashion & Design
 Film
 Music
 Television
 Theatre
 TV Listings




 
bulletHealth
bulletInternational
 Columns
bulletNational
 Columns
 Discussion Forums
 Report

bulletReport on Business
   - Staff Biographies
 Annual Reports
 Managing
 Money & Markets
 ROB Top 1000
 Small Business
 Smart Numbers
 Special Reports
 1999 Federal Budget

bulletScience
bulletSports
   - Staff Biographies
 Basketball
 Baseball
 Football
 Golf
 Hockey
 Other Sports

bulletTechnology
bulletTravel
Magazines
bulletROBmagazine.com
Special Interest
bulletCommunication Solutions new
bulletIT Management
bulletMillennium Series

Services Index
bulletA Globe History
bulletAbout us
bulletAdvertise
 Newspaper
 Web sites

bulletCorrections
bulletCustomer Service
 Change of Address
 General Inquiry
 Office information
 Subscribe to the paper
 Subscribe: International
 Subscribe: Gift
 Subscribe: Renewal
 Subscribe: Student new
 Vacation Suspension

bulletFree Headlines new
bulletHelp & Contact Us
bulletLink To Us
bulletMake Us Home
bulletNewspaper Assoc.
bulletPrivacy Policy
bulletReprints
 Information
 Order form

bulletSaturday Preview
bulletStory Search
bulletWhat's New
 
Refugee system 'scandalous,' judge says
Practice of deporting claimants to U.S.
for short stays called a 'useless and counterproductive exercise'

ESTANISLAO OZIEWICZ
The Globe and Mail
Friday, November 5, 1999

Toronto -- Canada's revolving-door refugee system is a "charade," puts an undue strain on Canadian taxpayers and constitutes "a scandalous abuse of our border," a Federal Court of Canada judge says.

Madame Justice Donna McGillis made the stinging comments in a case involving a woman from Kazakstan who made two failed refugee claims and two unsuccessful court challenges yet is being allowed to stay to pursue permanent residence.

"It is patently clear and obvious," Judge McGillis said, referring to this and other cases, "that the deportation of the applicants to the United States is a useless and counterproductive exercise that will result in the applicants filing a further futile claim for refugee status."

Surprisingly, Toronto lawyer Lorne Waldman, who won the decision for the Kazakstan woman, said Judge McGillis has exposed a "conspiracy of silence" among the federal government and refugee lawyers and advocates about a deportation process he called a sham.
Mr. Waldman said large numbers of rejected refugee claimants deported to the United States end up coming back to Canada to make second and even third claims.

"This is a very cosy situation that everyone just closes their eyes to, the immigration lawyers, the refugees, the refugee-support groups and the government because they all benefit from it."

Mr. Waldman said refugees are well-served because the system allows them repeated attempts to make a case and the government benefits because it is able to trumpet that it is getting rid of failed refugee claimants.

"No one knows where they are deported to. No one cares," Mr. Waldman said. "It just looks good, the government says, 'Look how efficient we are. We're getting tough.' The reality is that a lot of these people are being deported to the United States and most of them come back."

According to Immigration Department figures, since the beginning of 1996 about 3,300 unsuccessful refugee claimants have been deported to the United States. Yesterday, a department spokeswoman said officials were trying to find out how many of those were repeat claimants.

Paradoxically, Judge McGillis herself stayed the deportation of Svetlana Jmakina and her six- year-old son to allow Ms. Jmakina time to prove her marriage to a Canadian is legitimate, rather than one of convenience.

But Judge McGillis' ruling shows the judge's frustration with a system that allows deportation of non-United States' nationals to the United States, from where they can re-enter Canada and start the refugee process all over again.

"Rather than engaging in this charade of deporting applicants to the United States for a second time and implicitly condoning the making of revolving-door refugee claims, the [Immigration] Department should simply make decisions on the outstanding applications for family-class sponsorship and for permanent residence."

Ms. Jmakina's case illustrates the judge's concerns.

Ms. Jmakina and her then-infant child, Maxim, entered Canada in May, 1994 via the United States and claimed refugee status. A year later, a refugee panel determined she was not credible. She challenged that decision but it was dismissed in 1995.

Later that year, an immigration officer decided Ms. Jmakina and her son would not face harm in Kazakstan, a poor, but relatively peaceful part of the former of the Soviet Union.

Ms. Jmakina was arrested in Toronto in the spring of 1996, but instead of deporting her and her son to Kazakstan, immigration officials took her to Buffalo, N.Y.

There, she stayed at a refugee hostel for a little more than three months, whereupon she re-entered Canada and made another refugee claim. Earlier this year, she married a Montreal native, who is now trying to sponsor her for permanent residence. She has also applied to stay on compassionate grounds; one of her arguments is that her son, now in school, would be harmed by removal from Canada.

Meanwhile, her second claim for refugee status was rejected and she was ordered deported yet again.

Judge McGillis said that if she supported the Immigration Department's new attempt to deport Ms. Jmakina, the woman would be entitled to stay three months in Buffalo, return to Canada and make yet another refugee claim.

"The revolving-door approach to refugee claims," says Judge McGillis, "casts a dark shadow over our immigration system, places an unnecessary burden on Canadian taxpayers, delays the hearing of meritorious refugee claims and constitutes a scandalous abuse of our border."

In granting a stay of the removal order, Judge McGillis said deportation to the United States would serve no practical purpose: "In short, I cannot permit an innocent young child to be severely prejudiced by countenancing his deportation in circumstances that make no sense. I also see no purpose in separating the female applicant from her child."

Mr. Waldman said that under a reciprocal agreement between Canada and the United States, the Immigration Department deports failed refugee claimants who have come through the United States back to a U.S. border city.

He said Ottawa does this to save money: "The reason why they return them to the United States is because it doesn't cost them any money. It's a no-hassle deportation," compared to paying for a flight back to Kazakstan.

He said the law allows a deportee to make another claim after being out of Canada for 90 days, a feature intended to allow changing circumstances in the country of origin.




Subscribe to The Globe and Mail

More National News
Ottawa okays morning-after contraceptive
Controversial drug quietly approved after long battle
by Carolyn Abraham and Paul Taylor - Friday, November 5, 1999

Ottawa saves as judge bucks activist trend
by Kirk Makin - Friday, November 5, 1999

Refugee system 'scandalous,' judge says
Practice of deporting claimants to U.S. for short stays called a 'useless and counterproductive exercise'
by Estanislao Oziewicz - Friday, November 5, 1999

Quebec Premier blasts federal surplus
Bouchard calls on Ottawa to return money to provinces to finance essential services
by RhéAl SéGuin - Friday, November 5, 1999

Ottawa plan to top up aid for farmers 'heartless'
by Mark MacKinnon and Jill Mahoney - Friday, November 5, 1999


7 Day Search
 
Tips - Other Options
 
Noteworthy
Click here for the Editorial Cartoon

Special Series Archive
Archived features from The Globe and Mail.

What's New
The latest additions to globeandmail.com.

Writers
Gagnon

Lysiane Gagnon
· Inside Quebec


Simpson

Jeffrey Simpson
· Articles


Sullivan

Paul Sullivan
· The West



Discussion Forums
bulletMillennium Money
Does Paul Martin's economic plan indicate a financial readiness for the 21st Century?

bulletAthletic Advantages
Should the Ottawa Senators receive a tax break?

bulletAboriginal Manifesto
Public reactions and government responses to Mi'kmaq fishing and Native logging in BC demonstrate the depth of anti-Indian prejudice in this country. True or false?

bulletCareers
"Everybody says that there is an IT shortage in Canada, but having recently graduated ... I am still unemployed." Share your story!

bulletMutual Funds
A national airline. What is all the fuss about?

bulletTechnology
Show me the E-money! Would you trade in your coin for a smart card?

ChaptersGLOBE.com
Related Books
· Canadian Biographies
· Canadian Drama Books · Canadian History
· Canadian Politics & Government
· Canadian Travel Books

Help & Contact Us
Back to the top of this page
Copyright © 1999 Globe Information Services