Boston Globe Online / Business / The immigrant question
Home
Help

more tech news on digitalMASS


Ask Abuzz

Latest News
Latest business news
Latest high-tech news

Market Watch Dow:
10,536.70 (-66.9)
NASDAQ:
3,585.01 (-84.37)
S&P 500:
1,412.14 (-12.03)
More stock quotes

Columnists
Steve Bailey
Boston Capital
Hiawatha Bray
Kenneth Hooker
Charles A. Jaffe
David Warsh

Features
Technology and Innovation
Simple Interest
The Globe 100

Links
1999 Globe 100
The Best of Massachusetts Business

Technology
Check out Boston. com's Tech Center

Personal Finance
Financial calculators, financial advice, stock quotes and more

Boston.com business section, including Emerging Business

Yellow Pages
Alphabetical listings, courtesy Boston.com's Yellow Pages Directory
Banks
Brokers
Business Consultants
Credit and Debt Counseling
Credit Unions
Exchanges
Financial Planners
Insurance
Investment Bankers
Investment Securities
Loans
Mutual Funds
Retirement Planners
Savings and Loans

Sections Boston Globe Online: Page One Nation | World Metro | Region Business Sports Living | Arts Editorials

Weekly
Health | Science (Tue.)
Food (Wed.)
Calendar (Thu.)
At Home (Thu.)
Picture This (Fri.)

Sunday
Automotive
Focus
Learning
Magazine
New England
Real Estate
Travel
City Weekly
South Weekly
West Weekly
North Weekly
NorthWest Weekly
NH Weekly

Features
Archives
Book Reviews
Columns
Comics
Crossword
Horoscopes
Death Notices
Lottery
Movie Reviews
Music Reviews
Obituaries
Special Reports
Today's stories A-Z
TV & Radio
Weather

Classifieds
Autos
Classifieds
Help Wanted
Real Estate


Buy a Globe photo

Help
E-mail addresses
Send us feedback

Alternative views
Low-graphics version
Acrobat version (.pdf)

Search the Globe:

Today
Yesterday

Search the Web
Using AltaVista:


The Boston Globe OnlineBoston.com Boston Globe Online / Business
[ Send this story to a friend | Easy-print version | Add to Daily User ]

   
ADVERTISEMENTS



NextCard Internet Visa - Apply Now
The immigrant question

It's an issue candidates in search of votes won't touch

By Robert J. Samuelson, 5/9/2000

he Elian Gonzalez case reminds us, in a curious and unintended way, of the great forgotten issue of the 2000 presidential campaign: immigration. Forgotten, because hardly anyone discusses it, certainly not Al Gore or George Bush. Yet more than most of what they are discussing, immigration will shape America in the 21st century.

A long Census Bureau report (based on 1997 statistics) catalogs immigration's immense impact:

Almost 10 percent of the population was foreign-born, double the level of 1970 (4.7 percent) and the highest since 1930 (11.6 percent).

Recent immigrants come mainly from Latin America (51 percent) and Asia (27 percent), a huge change from 1970, when most came from Europe (62 percent) and Canada (9 percent).

Some immigrants quickly do well; many do not. For households headed by immigrants, the poverty rate among children under 18 (32 percent) was almost twice as high as among households headed by native-born Americans (18 percent).

A smaller proportion of immigrants are citizens: an estimated 35 percent, down from about 66 percent in 1970.

In 1997, about half of 25.8 million immigrants were congregated in five metropolitan areas: Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County (4.8 million); New York-New Jersey-Connecticut (4.6 million); Miami-Fort Lauderdale (1.4 million); San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose (1.4 million); and Chicago-Gary-Kenosha (1.1 million).

If nothing else, the Elian Gonzalez controversy has taught us that immigration issues quickly become inflamed. Each immigrant's story is unique and, often, intensely moving. It's a thicket of ethnic, racial, national, and ethical passions.

The hardest questions: Are we getting the ''right kind'' of immigrants? If not, can we do anything about it?

In his book ''Heaven's Door,'' Harvard University economist George Borjas, who immigrated to the United States from Cuba at age 12, argues that current policy courts disaster. It tends to result in poor, unskilled immigrants. Poorer immigrants, he says, are assimilated slowly. They tend to cluster in ethnic ghettos and use a lot of government services. The United States would be better off, Borjas contends, favoring better-educated immigrants. His message has a certain common-sense appeal. Don't stop immigration - but be more selective.

To some extent, the Census Bureau report corroborates his portrait of immigrants. They have lower earnings than native-born Americans: 25 percent lower for men, 14 percent for women. About 20 percent of all people without private or government health insurance are immigrants. About 25 percent of immigrants receive some sort of income-related federal assistance.

Baby boomers feel entitled to generous government benefits, mainly Social Security and Medicare. On the one hand, immigration should make it easier for the country to pay for these benefits. It increases the number of future workers and taxpayers. On the other hand, many of these workers and their families may need their own government benefits. There could be a collision between the needy young and the expectant old.

Canada's point system gives preference to better-educated immigrants. Borjas is suggesting something like this for the United States. But to discuss immigration in anything but the blandest terms is to risk sounding like a bigot. In practice, Borjas's plan would discriminate against Hispanics. More than 25 percent of today's immigrants are from Mexico; they are among the poorest and least skilled. They would suffer under any plan that promotes skills-based immigration. Both Bush and Gore are eagerly pursuing Hispanic votes. Neither wants to sound like Pat Buchanan.

Practical and ethical issues also loom. Can we better police our borders to limit illegal immigration?

Then there's the current policy on legal immigration. It gives preferences to the children, spouses, parents, and siblings of US citizens or permanent residents. Everyone favors some family preferences. It's simple humanity. But how far should they go?

By 2025, the Census Bureau projects, immigrants will be 12 percent of the population; their American-born children will probably represent an equal number. Perhaps it is naive to expect candidates to address an issue fraught with political hazards and ethical ambiguities. But if this isn't about the future, what would be?

Robert J. Samuelson is an economics reporter in Washington.

This story ran on page D4 of the Boston Globe on 5/9/2000.
© Copyright 2000 Globe Newspaper Company.

[ Send this story to a friend | Easy-print version | Add to Daily User ]


Click here for advertiser information

© Copyright 1999 Globe Newspaper Company
Boston Globe Extranet
Extending our newspaper services to the web
Return to the home page
of The Globe Online