www.globeandmail.com News Books Careers Mutual Funds Stocks ROB Magazine Technology
Home  |  Business  |  National  |  International  |  Sports  |  Features  |  Arts  |  Forums  |  Subscribe

The Globe and Mail
Tuesday, August 17
leaf stats

Search

Tips & Other Options
Contents
bulletReport on Business
bulletNational
bulletInternational
bulletSports
bulletFeatures
bulletArts & Leisure
bulletCommentary
bulletFocus & Books
bulletClassifieds
bulletBirths & Deaths
bulletTravel
bulletHealth
bulletScience
bulletTechnology

NorstarMall.ca

Yellow.ca

News Index
bulletArts & Leisure
 Art
 Books
 Broadcast Week
 Fashion & Design
 Film
 Music
 Television
 Theatre
 TV Listings

bulletBirths & Deaths
bulletClassifieds
 Automotive
 Business Marketplace
 National personals
 Online personals
 Place an Ad
 Real estate rentals
 Real estate sales
 Services & Merchandise

bulletCommentary
 Columns
 Editorials
 Editorial Cartoon
 Letters to the Editor
 Send a letter to the Editor

bulletFeatures
 Amazing Facts
 Century of the Millennium
 Essay
 Fifth Column
 Life Story
 Lives Lived
 Millennium 100
 Social Studies
 Wax and Wane

bulletFocus & Books
 Book news
 Book reviews

bulletHealth
bulletInternational
 Columns
 The Globe Abroad

bulletNational
 Columns
 Issues Forum
 Report

bulletReport on Business
   - Staff Biographies
 Annual Reports
 Enterprise
 Managing
 Money & Markets
 ROB Top 1000
 Smart Numbers
 Special Reports
 1999 Federal Budget

bulletScience
bulletSports
   - Staff Biographies
 Basketball
 Baseball
 Football
 Golf
 Hockey
 Other Sports

bulletTechnology
bulletTravel
Magazines
ROBmagazine.com
Special Interest
Millennium Series
IT Management

Services Index
bulletA Globe History
bulletAbout globeandmail.com
bulletAdvertise
 Newspaper
 Web sites

bulletCustomer Service
 Change of Address
 General Inquiry
 Office information
 Subscribe to the paper
 Subscribe: International
 Subscribe: Gift
 Subscribe: Renewal
 Vacation Suspension

bulletHelp & Contact Us
bulletLink To Us
bulletMake Us Home
bulletNewspaper Assoc.
bulletPrivacy Policy
bulletReprints
 Information
 Order form

bulletStory Search
bulletWeekday Lineup
bulletWhat's New
  What Canadians can learn from the boats full of migrants

GORDON GIBSON

Tuesday, August 17, 1999

IN VANCOUVER -- The arrival in British Columbia of boatloads of illegal migrants is useful for all concerned.

The passengers will be getting what they paid for: the chance to disappear invisibly into the North American economy, after a restful orientation period of Canadian-taxpayer-financed health care, welfare and legal aid. The voyage may have been rough and the conditions of indenture to organized crime severe, but many people are prepared to endure such hardship on the gamble of a better life.

But the situation is useful for Canadians, too. As inhabitants of a lazy political entity that hasn't had a revolution or the need to repel invaders since Confederation, we are such lily-livered, soft-option and infinitely nice people that we absolutely refuse to face any hard issue until our collective noses are rubbed in it. Well, this rubbing has arrived, with new ships reported en route to Canadian waters daily.

Our political masters don't know what to do, not having finished their polling and focus groups. Of course, they know what most British Columbians want, which is the hard line. Variations include pushing the boats back off shore, deporting anyone who has arrived here illegally without further ado, or, at a minimum, detaining the migrants in spartan conditions until the "refugee" charade has been completed.

But what the government strategists aren't yet sure about is how this will play with their Toronto ethnic voters. Although it is increasingly apparent that the people most outraged about all this are legal immigrants who have got here the right but hard way, old habits do not die easily for Ottawa; so it mumbles vaguely about being bound by international conventions as an excuse for inaction.

This is nonsense. Every country has great latitude to interpret international commitments as it sees fit in its own laws and administrative practices. The broad range of immigration systems in existence demonstrates this. In the law of this country, even the Singh decision (in which the Supreme Court of Canada held that everyone in Canada, here legally or not, is entitled to full Charter of Rights protection at once) could simply be set aside or modified by Parliament. No, the failure to act arises not from legal obligation, but from confusion and electoral fear.

No one can put steel in the backs of chameleon politicians, but maybe the confusion can be remedied by some clear thinking. The basic problem is that we Canadians feel guilty about our good luck in living in this country. (We much overestimate our attractiveness; the United States is far and away the destination of choice for most immigrants, including the current boat people. But such is our conceit.)

One way to expunge these feelings of guilt is to share the wealth by allowing others in. That is the softheaded basis of our current immigration policy.

Why softheaded? Reason number one: There are just too many less fortunate people in the world for Canada to share itself equally with everyone. How to choose just a few when the number of needy rises into the billions? If we really want to help, the best policy is massive foreign aid and the removal of all restrictions on imports from Third World countries, to help others help themselves. Simpler still, we could eliminate our national borders and let the world's people migrate as they will. "Wait a minute," says the limousine liberal. "Hard to sell that one."

Reason number two: We ought not to feel guilty. The right way to feel, if you are so inclined, is generous, but that is a very different sort of sentiment. We should not feel guilty because we and our ancestors have earned what we have and we collectively add to and defend that endowment year after year.

Canada is not a rich country because of our resources, though that was once the case. We are wealthy because we respect the rule of law and the fair and free operation of markets, require democratic accountability of our rulers, reward hard work, invest in education and pay attention to technology. Other countries do some of those things better, but we get a passing grade.

None of these aspects of social organization is site-specific. Any country can have these characteristics and benefit from the ensuing wealth. In that sense, if we want to help others we should "export the revolution," as a famous communist used to say about another sort of philosophy. Alas, collectively we seem not to understand ourselves well enough to know why we are rich -- and therefore we feel guilty.

But maybe we can learn from all this. The answers are not complicated. Immigration is good for a country, adding new ideas and dynamism. For general immigration, choose the annual number that the country can comfortably absorb and then select the best you can find from wherever. Make the "family class" very small.

For the refugee category, pick a number according to your generosity. Then take the neediest first. And unless queue-jumpers come from countries we officially certify as barbaric, send them home. Period.
E-mail: ggibson@bc-home.com


Search
Search up to one week back for the selected parts of The Globe and Mail that we have online. See tips & other options for help.


 
Noteworthy
Click here for the Editorial Cartoon

Special Series Archive
Archived features from The Globe and Mail.

What's New
The latest additions to globeandmail.com.
Writers
Gagnon

Lysiane Gagnon
· Inside Quebec


Simpson

Jeffrey Simpson
· Articles


Sullivan

Paul Sullivan
· The West


Wente

Margaret Wente
· Counter-Point, Fifth Column



Forums
Au Révoir to Arts Councils?
Will Arts Councils disappear? What do you think?

To Freelance or Not to Freelance?
What is your opinion of temporary work? Let us know!

My Baby's Got The Blues
Early discharges from hospitals are leading to more illness among Canadian babies. Do you have stories to share?

Books
Should we expect our popular fictions to better reflect the reality of violence and its aftermath? Or would we be losing entertainment value if James Bond were to be more human? Share your thoughts here.

Poetry
Share your poetry.

Careers
"I believe that the IT skills shortage is being hyped by private and public training instituitions who want to cash in on the demand for training." Do you agree?.

Mutual Funds
Growth in small capitalization companies can be partly attributed to the government's tax credit for people investing into LSVCC (Labour Sponsored Venture Capital Corporations). Have the government's incentives increased your investment in LSVCC?Let us know on globefund.com.

Technology
"I don't think many people realize how insecure Web banking is. Would you use ATMs if all you had to do was put in a password and no card was required?" Big Bank Bust, in our forums.

ChaptersGLOBE.com
Related Books
· Canadian Biographies
· Canadian Drama Books
· Canadian History
· Canadian Politics & Government
· Canadian Travel Books

Help & Contact Us
Back to the top of this page
Copyright © 1999 Globe Information Services